<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Council Decides Today On Safety Center [1/19 Update]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/</link>
	<description>A Downtown Raleigh Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: eyenstine</title>
		<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>eyenstine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtraleigh.com/?p=1703#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>I hope all you good folks who post in favor of the Public Safety Center are letting City Council members know what you think they should do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope all you good folks who post in favor of the Public Safety Center are letting City Council members know what you think they should do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyenstine</title>
		<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/#comment-3255</link>
		<dc:creator>eyenstine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtraleigh.com/?p=1703#comment-3255</guid>
		<description>A handful of thw highly-placed, representative of those who were anti DTR progress for years, would condemn the Safety Center.  They call for a referendum, likely for a low-turnout primary.  It&#039;s the loud anti-whatevers that will be heard and likely carry the day.  But there is no need for a referendum.  We&#039;ve elected city councilpeople to represent us.  Let them do their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A handful of thw highly-placed, representative of those who were anti DTR progress for years, would condemn the Safety Center.  They call for a referendum, likely for a low-turnout primary.  It&#8217;s the loud anti-whatevers that will be heard and likely carry the day.  But there is no need for a referendum.  We&#8217;ve elected city councilpeople to represent us.  Let them do their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eyenstine</title>
		<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>eyenstine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtraleigh.com/?p=1703#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>There is no waste designed for that building.  And Raleigh will continue to grow -- the critical mass for growth being long ago reached. And if the building is not built to accomodate growth (as it is designed to do), it will only result in future, ragtag attempts to make do. And that will only interfere with the critical mission of protecting public safety. The ignorant approach that the building should be &quot;scaled down&quot; at this time will hurt this city if followed.  Now is the time time make good use of the lowered costs of building supplies.  It&#039;s likely the only chance we&#039;ll have to get the building that will fulfill the need in superb fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no waste designed for that building.  And Raleigh will continue to grow &#8212; the critical mass for growth being long ago reached. And if the building is not built to accomodate growth (as it is designed to do), it will only result in future, ragtag attempts to make do. And that will only interfere with the critical mission of protecting public safety. The ignorant approach that the building should be &#8220;scaled down&#8221; at this time will hurt this city if followed.  Now is the time time make good use of the lowered costs of building supplies.  It&#8217;s likely the only chance we&#8217;ll have to get the building that will fulfill the need in superb fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boidair</title>
		<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Boidair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtraleigh.com/?p=1703#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>ANOTHER 2 WEEKS ,then a month, 6 months, and canceled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANOTHER 2 WEEKS ,then a month, 6 months, and canceled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boidair</title>
		<link>http://dtraleigh.com/2010/01/council-decides-today-on-safety-center-119-update/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Boidair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dtraleigh.com/?p=1703#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>Wow! you guys would rather abandon the city&#039;s needs to save $60 over 5 years. We always talk about improving the city, but not willing to do what is necessary. I&#039;m all for building it because it&#039;s the right thing to do. It&#039;s a major upgrade to current facility, adds to skyline, and it will increase the density in downtown. We are going to continue to lag behind every other big city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! you guys would rather abandon the city&#8217;s needs to save $60 over 5 years. We always talk about improving the city, but not willing to do what is necessary. I&#8217;m all for building it because it&#8217;s the right thing to do. It&#8217;s a major upgrade to current facility, adds to skyline, and it will increase the density in downtown. We are going to continue to lag behind every other big city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

